A Comparison of Electricity-Pricing Schemes: Equity, Cost-Recovery, and Economic Efficiency | |
---|---|
學年 | 104 |
學期 | 2 |
發表日期 | 2016-06-29 |
作品名稱 | A Comparison of Electricity-Pricing Schemes: Equity, Cost-Recovery, and Economic Efficiency |
作品名稱(其他語言) | |
著者 | Ming-Feng Hung; Bin-Tzong Chie; Huei-Chu Liao |
作品所屬單位 | |
出版者 | |
會議名稱 | Western Economic Association International 91st Annual Conference |
會議地點 | Hilton Portland & Executive Tower, Oregon, USA |
摘要 | Electricity pricing is the main economic instrument used to charge for residential electricity and to manage its consumption. A regulated price in general cannot reflect the true value of electricity. However, a market-based electricity-pricing scheme for residential electricity is efficient while it is also criticized due to its unaffordability to the poor. This article empirically compares four electricity-pricing schemes, namely, increasing-block pricing (IBP), floating increasing-block pricing (FIBP), free market pricing (FMP), and a price-cum-trade incentive system (PTS), in terms of the aspects of efficiency, equity, and cost recovery by using electricity-related data for Taiwan. The research results show that IBP and FIBP suffer from the same problem in that it is hard to be cost-neutral, and FMP is economically efficient while preferring utility to the households. PTS performs the best, in that it can be economically efficient, as well as cost-neutral, and it can also improve income distribution. |
關鍵字 | residential electricity;efficiency;affordability;cost recovery;consumer’s surplus;floating increasing-block pricing |
語言 | en_US |
收錄於 | |
會議性質 | 國際 |
校內研討會地點 | 無 |
研討會時間 | 20160629~20160703 |
通訊作者 | |
國別 | USA |
公開徵稿 | |
出版型式 | |
出處 | Western Economic Association International 91st Annual Conference |
相關連結 |
機構典藏連結 ( http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/107444 ) |