教師資料查詢 | 類別: 會議論文 | 教師: 林長青 Lin, Chang-Ching (瀏覽個人網頁)

標題:A Systematic Flow to Compare the Rank Order Vectors from Solving the Paper Shredder Selection Problem Using AHP–GTMA and AHP–TOPSIS
學年107
學期1
發表日期2018/11/09
作品名稱A Systematic Flow to Compare the Rank Order Vectors from Solving the Paper Shredder Selection Problem Using AHP–GTMA and AHP–TOPSIS
作品名稱(其他語言)
著者Chih-Yung Chen; Chang-Ching Lin; Zheng-Yun Zhuang
作品所屬單位
出版者
會議名稱The 2018 International Conference on Innovation, Communication and Engineering
會議地點Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China
摘要This study mainly cites the following works (and is an extension work to which): (1) Modelling the decision of paper shredder selection using analytic hierarchy process and graph theory and matrix approach (AHP–GTMA). Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9(12), 1-11, 2017, and (2) Applying AHP+GTMA and AHP+TOPSIS on solving the same paper shredder selection problem and comparing the results. In: Proceedings of ICICE 2017. In (1), the recent AHP–GTMA approach had been applied as a decision aid in real practice to select the best paper shredder for a company as to make a bulk purchase order. In (2), another ‘AHP–TOPSIS’ selection decision method was introduced as an alternative multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) approach to solve the same problem, while the final results obtained by the two models (e.g., the rank orders) are observed and compared. However, as there is a critical question as to whether the use of one such recently proposed approach (AHP–GTMA) is effective to aid the selection decision problem in practice, the comparison process should be as rigorous as possible, but in (2) the comparison was made on a rough observational basis and this lacks of a solid basis that is weaved by several solid methods. In this study, as a remedy to this, a systematic flow to compare the main results from using these two methods (i.e., the rank order vectors) is proposed. When the similarity between the two obtained final rank orders is confirmed using the proposed method (to validate the observed similarity between the rank orders using a set of initial observable geometrical-based measures and then applying a statistical-based non-parametric test over the rank order vectors), the effectiveness of the AHP–GTMA approach is determined. It is shown the rank order among the alternatives that is determined by an AHP–GTMA is very similar to that which is obtained using an AHP–TOPSIS. Therefore, the effectiveness in solving a selection decision problem in practice using an AHP–GTMA is therefore verified by the verified similarity between the results.
關鍵字Selection decision;Alternative ranking;Rank order vector;Comparison;Graph theory and matrix approach (GTMA);Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS)
語言英文
收錄於
會議性質國際
校內研討會地點
研討會時間20181109~20181114
通訊作者Zheng-Yun Zhuang
國別中華民國
公開徵稿
出版型式
出處Conference Proceeding of ICICE 2018
相關連結
Google+ 推薦功能,讓全世界都能看到您的推薦!