教師資料查詢 | 類別: 期刊論文 | 教師: 張玉坤 Yue-cune Chang (瀏覽個人網頁)

標題:Effects of combined use of non-nutritive sucking, oral sucrose, and facilitated tucking on infant behavioural states across heel-stick procedures: A prospective, randomised controlled trial
學年101
學期2
出版(發表)日期2013/07/01
作品名稱Effects of combined use of non-nutritive sucking, oral sucrose, and facilitated tucking on infant behavioural states across heel-stick procedures: A prospective, randomised controlled trial
作品名稱(其他語言)
著者Liaw, Jen-Jiuan; Yang, Luke; Lee, Chuen-Ming; Fan, Hueng-Chuen; Chang, Yue-Cune; Li-Ping Cheng
單位淡江大學數學學系
出版者Bromley: Elsevier Ltd
著錄名稱、卷期、頁數International Journal of Nursing Studies 50(7), pp.883-894
摘要Background
Pain and stress agitate preterm infants, interrupting their sleep. Frequent high arousal states may affect infants’ brain development and illness recovery. Preserving infants’ sleep and relieving their pain during painful procedures are both important for their health.

Objectives
To compare the effectiveness of different combinations of non-nutritive sucking (sucking), oral sucrose, and facilitated tucking (tucking) with routine care on infants’ sleep–wake states before, during, and after heel-stick procedures.

Design
Prospective, randomised controlled trial.

Setting
Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Taipei.

Method
A convenience sample of 110 infants (gestational age 26.4–37 weeks) needing heel sticks were randomly assigned to five combinations of non-pharmacological treatments: sucking–oral sucrose–tucking; sucking–oral sucrose; oral sucrose–tucking; sucking–tucking; and routine care. Infant states, measured by a state-coding scheme, included quiet sleep, active sleep, transition, quiet awake, active awake, and fussing or crying. All states were recorded at 1-min intervals during four phases: baseline, intervention, heel-stick procedures, and recovery.

Results
Infants receiving sucking–oral sucrose–tucking or sucking–oral sucrose experienced 52.8% (p = 0.023) and 42.6% (p = 0.063) more quiet-sleep occurrences than those receiving routine care after adjusting for phase, baseline states, non-treatment sucking during baseline and recovery, positioning, and infants’ characteristics. Infants receiving oral sucrose–tucking, sucking–oral sucrose, sucking–oral sucrose–tucking, and sucking–tucking experienced 77.3% (p < 0.001), 72.1% (p = 0.008), 51.5% (p = 0.017), and 33.0% (p = 0.105) fewer occurrences of fussing or crying, respectively, than those receiving routine care after adjusting for related factors.

Conclusions
The four treatment combinations differentially reduced infants’ high arousal across heel-stick procedures. The combined use of oral sucrose–tucking, sucking–oral sucrose, and sucking–oral sucrose–tucking more effectively reduced occurrences of infant fussing or crying than routine care. Treatment combinations of sucking–oral sucrose–tucking and sucking–oral sucrose also better facilitated infants’ sleep than routine care. To preserve infants’ sleep, clinicians should use combinations of non-nutritive sucking, oral sucrose, and facilitated tucking to reduce agitation during painful procedures.
關鍵字Behavioural states;Facilitated tucking;Non-nutritive sucking;Oral sucrose;Infants;pain
語言英文
ISSN1873-491X;0020-7489
期刊性質國外
收錄於SCI;
產學合作
通訊作者
審稿制度
國別英國
公開徵稿
出版型式,電子版,紙本
相關連結
Google+ 推薦功能,讓全世界都能看到您的推薦!