教師資料查詢 | 類別: 會議論文 | 教師: 陳志民 CHIH-MIN CHEN (瀏覽個人網頁)

標題:事業以聯合行為或濫用市場地位調漲價格經處分後要求回復原價之探討--美國反托拉斯法之分析
學年90
學期1
發表日期2001/10/29
作品名稱事業以聯合行為或濫用市場地位調漲價格經處分後要求回復原價之探討--美國反托拉斯法之分析
作品名稱(其他語言)
著者陳志民
作品所屬單位淡江大學公共行政學系
出版者臺北市行政院公平交易委員會
會議名稱第九屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會
會議地點臺北市, 臺灣
摘要本文擬就事業因聯合協議或濫用市場地位不當抬高價格經處分禁止後,倘市場價格仍處於非競爭水平時, 競爭主管機關有無法理及政策考量上之依據,得要求違法事業將價格回復至勾結前之價格水平,以美國法為分析對象,為一比較法之研究。除介紹與分析相關競爭法規與法院實務對此一議題之看法外, 並將從反托拉斯法學理的觀點,思考競爭主管機關能否介入非被管制事業之價格決定過程?其可介入之程度為何?以及反托拉斯法上之
私人訴訟制度於此一議題上所可以扮演的角色, 有何值得借鏡之處。
n this paper, I explore the issue of whether the FTC should have theregulatory power to mandate a price reversal to the pre-violationlevel when the alleged non-competitive price resulting from collusionor the abuse of a firm's dominant market position remains intact evenafter the violators have been punished and have ended theirinappropriate competing behavior. I rely mainly on the experience fromthe United States to examine whether this issue had ever beenpresented to and decided by its enforcement agencies and courts. Basedon the conclusion from the analysis, I further consider whether theAmerican experience could be translated into our legal system tosupport or disapprove the extension of the FTC's power to set theprices for industries not subject to rate regulation. In addition,whether private antitrust litigation is capable of functioningequivalently as an alternative to price reversal in terms of the needto maintain market competition and protect consumer will also beelaborated upon in this paper.;In this paper, I explore the issue of whether the FTC should have theregulatory power to mandate a price reversal to the pre-violationlevel when the alleged non-competitive price resulting from collusionor the abuse of a firm's dominant market position remains intact evenafter the violators have been punished and have ended theirinappropriate competing behavior. I rely mainly on the experience fromthe United States to examine whether this issue had ever beenpresented to and decided by its enforcement agencies and courts. Basedon the conclusion from the analysis, I further consider whether theAmerican experience could be translated into our legal system tosupport or disapprove the extension of the FTC's power to set theprices for industries not subject to rate regulation. In addition,whether private antitrust litigation is capable of functioningequivalently as an alternative to price reversal in terms of the needto maintain market competition and protect consumer will also beelaborated upon in this paper.
關鍵字聯合行為;反托拉斯法;回復原價;公平交易法;Collusion;Antitrust Law;Price Reversal;Fair Trade Law
語言中文
收錄於
會議性質國內
校內研討會地點
研討會時間20011029~20011030
通訊作者陳志民
國別中華民國
公開徵稿Y
出版型式
出處第九屆競爭政策與公平交易法學術研討會論文集頁497-530
相關連結
Google+ 推薦功能,讓全世界都能看到您的推薦!