教師資料查詢 | 類別: 會議論文 | 教師: 宋佩芬 PEI-FEN SUNG (瀏覽個人網頁)

標題:國民教育輔導團員與一般教師之教學專業如能比較: 以歷史料為例
學年95
學期2
發表日期2007/06/14
作品名稱國民教育輔導團員與一般教師之教學專業如能比較: 以歷史料為例
作品名稱(其他語言)Comparing Social Studies Curriculum and Instruction Advisors' and Ordinary Teachers' Subject Matter Knowledge and Pedagogy: Using the History Subject as an Example
著者宋佩芬
作品所屬單位淡江大學課程與教學研究所
出版者臺北縣淡江大學
會議名稱課程改革與教學輔導國際學術研討會=The International Conference of Curriculum Reform and Instructional Support
會議地點臺北市, 臺灣
摘要九年一貫課程改革使輔導圍再次受到重視,各縣市紛紛利用「國民教育輔導圍」來
協助推動學校的教學改革。輔導圍員被期望為優秀的教師或教師中的菁英,並被賦
予推動改革、教學輔導等功能。然而,輔導團員是否比一般教師其備較佳的知識與
教學技能仍是待答的問題。本研究對全國公私立國中社會領域教師進行問卷調查,
以歷史背景的教師為觀察對象,發現曾經擔任輔導團員與未曾擔任輔導團員的教師
在歷史知識、學科概念及教學知能上並沒有差異。本文討論此研究結果對輔導團員
的甄選及專業發展的義涵。;The I_9th Grade Integrated CUlTiculum Reform has revitalized long-established
Curriculum and Instruction Advisory Groups. Counties and cities began restructuring
the Advisory Groups since the reform. Advisors in different academic fields are
recruited and expected to provide cUlTicular and instructional consultation and facilitate
change in schools. Advisors are widely regarded as the elites of teachers with more and
better professional knowledge and skills. However, whether their subject matter
knowledge and pedagogy are better than ordinary teachers remains to be an empirical
question. This study surveyed all public and private junior-high school social studies
teachers in Taiwan. The result shows that there is no significant difference between
advisors and ordinary teachers in aspects of historical knowledge, conceptions of history
and history teaching approaches. I discuss the implications for Advisory Groups'
recruitment and professional development.
關鍵字九年一貫;社會領域;國民教育輔導團;歷史教學;1-9th Grade integrated curriculum reform;Social studies;History teaching;Advisory Group
語言中文
收錄於
會議性質國際
校內研討會地點台北校園
研討會時間20070614~20070615
通訊作者
國別中華民國
公開徵稿Y
出版型式
出處課程改革與教學輔導國際學術研討會論文集=Proceedings of the International Conference of Curriculum Reform and Instructional Support,頁123-136
相關連結
Google+ 推薦功能,讓全世界都能看到您的推薦!