期刊論文
| 學年 | 114 |
|---|---|
| 學期 | 2 |
| 出版（發表）日期 | 2026-06-12 |
| 作品名稱 | Divergent Paths to a Shared Goal: Comparative Legislative Responses to Account Suspension on Digital Labour Platforms |
| 作品名稱（其他語言） | |
| 著者 | YUN-HAO HSIN |
| 單位 | |
| 出版者 | |
| 著錄名稱、卷期、頁數 | Orbeliani Law Review 5(1), p.23-40 |
| 摘要 | With the widespread use of algorithmic management in the platform economy, account suspension has emerged as a core issue affecting working conditions. This article analyses the differing legislative responses adopted by the European Union and Taiwan to address this challenge. The EU approaches this issue from a “data protection” perspective, conceptualizing algorithmic decision-making as a dual issue of working conditions and personal data protection. It clarifies the underlying facts of automated decision-making through mandatory algorithmic transparency obligations to resolve disputes. In contrast, whilst Taiwan has not directly regulated algorithms, it has developed a unique “contractual regulation” approach. Through mandatory contractual terms formulated by administrative authorities, any unilaterally drafted terms contradicting these mandatory terms are rendered void. Moreover, Taiwan’s new law requires the establishment of an appeal procedure and reverses the burden of proof, requiring platform operators to prove the legitimacy of account suspensions. Although the EU and Taiwan differ in their legislative approaches, both seek to alleviate information asymmetry between platform operators and platform workers, and to ensure procedural fairness in account suspension decisions. |
| 關鍵字 | Algorithmic Management;Account Suspension;Platform Worker;Transparency;Standardised Contractual Regulations |
| 語言 | en |
| ISSN | |
| 期刊性質 | 國外 |
| 收錄於 | NotTSSCI |
| 產學合作 | |
| 通訊作者 | |
| 審稿制度 | 是 |
| 國別 | GEO |
| 公開徵稿 | |
| 出版型式 | ,電子版,紙本 |
| 相關連結 |
機構典藏連結 ( http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/129646 ) |