期刊論文
| 學年 | 92 |
|---|---|
| 學期 | 2 |
| 出版（發表）日期 | 2004-05-01 |
| 作品名稱 | Discussion of "Comparison of Linear Scheduling Model and Repetitive Scheduling Method"by Kris G. Mattila and Amy Park |
| 作品名稱（其他語言） | |
| 著者 | 楊亦東; Ioannou, Photios G. |
| 單位 | 淡江大學土木工程學系 |
| 出版者 | |
| 著錄名稱、卷期、頁數 | ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 130(3), pp.461-463 |
| 摘要 | This paper mistakenly treats the ‘‘controlling sequence’’ defined for the first time in Harris and Ioannou ~1998! as a synonym for the critical path in the traditional critical path method ~CPM!, by stating that ‘‘the control points in the repetitive scheduling method ~RSM! are used to define the controlling sequence of activities, the critical path in a CPM schedule, which in turn determines the project duration.’’ Yet, the introduction of the ‘‘controlling sequence’’ and its differentiation from the traditional critical path is a main contribution of RSM, which should be pointed out and recognized explicitly. By overlooking this important distinction, the paper ends with misleading results. Moreover, the paper identifies critical activities incorrectly, such as in Figs. 5, 7, 13, 15, 20, and 22. Thus, the purpose of this discussion is to correct these misunderstandings and to clarify the original definitions of the controlling sequence and critical activities in RSM. |
| 關鍵字 | |
| 語言 | en_US |
| ISSN | 0733-9364 1943-7862 |
| 期刊性質 | 國外 |
| 收錄於 | |
| 產學合作 | |
| 通訊作者 | |
| 審稿制度 | 否 |
| 國別 | USA |
| 公開徵稿 | |
| 出版型式 | ,電子版,紙本 |
| 相關連結 |
機構典藏連結 ( http://tkuir.lib.tku.edu.tw:8080/dspace/handle/987654321/69738 ) |